[IBM] Add kfp-tekton deployment and update IBM stacks#1621
Conversation
|
/cc @moficodes |
|
@Tomcli: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: moficodes. Note that only kubeflow members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/cc @animeshsingh |
|
/lgtm cc @pvaneck for quick review |
pvaneck
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey, looks good. Just a quick question. Do the YAML files in this PR reflect the resources listed here: https://github.com/kubeflow/kfp-tekton/blob/master/install/v0.4.0/kfp-tekton.yaml ? Noticed that some roles like ml-pipeline-persistenceagent-role were kind Role in that file but ClusterRole here, so I'm curious what prompts these changes in this manifests installation context.
| metadata: | ||
| name: minio | ||
| annotations: | ||
| sidecar.istio.io/inject: "false" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm curious. Were you were having sidecar issues?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For multi-user, the Kubeflow namespace needs to have sidecar injection. However, Minio is not suppose to have sidecar and this was done as part of the single ibm stack deployment. However, with the new independent application approach, I need to remove all the dependencies between each application. I put the annotations to our Minio overlays so that it can be deployed after the sidecar injection labels being patched in the previous applications.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: animeshsingh, moficodes, Tomcli The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
…and update IBM stacks (#1628) * add kfp-tekton deployment and update IBM stacks * update owner file * pin ibm v1.2 manifests * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Animesh Singh <singhan@us.ibm.com> Co-authored-by: Animesh Singh <singhan@us.ibm.com>
Will be responsible for maintaining manifests for KFServing, OpenShift, IKS etc. PRs merged: kubeflow#1515 kubeflow#1575 kubeflow#1580 kubeflow#1617 Reviews: kubeflow#1582 kubeflow#1621 kubeflow#1625 kubeflow#1627 kubeflow#1628 kubeflow/kfctl#419
PRs: Manifest (kubeflow/community-distribution#1603) Website (kubeflow/website#1752) Reviews: Manifest(kubeflow/community-distribution#1621, kubeflow/community-distribution#1594, kubeflow/community-distribution#1582, kubeflow/community-distribution#1567) kfctl(kubeflow/kfctl#419) Website(kubeflow/website#2327) Issue Triage: kfctl(kubeflow/kfctl#428, kubeflow/kfctl#424, kubeflow/kfctl#418)
PRs: Manifest (kubeflow/community-distribution#1603) Website (kubeflow/website#1752) Reviews: Manifest(kubeflow/community-distribution#1621, kubeflow/community-distribution#1594, kubeflow/community-distribution#1582, kubeflow/community-distribution#1567) kfctl(kubeflow/kfctl#419) Website(kubeflow/website#2327) Issue Triage: kfctl(kubeflow/kfctl#428, kubeflow/kfctl#424, kubeflow/kfctl#418)
Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #
Description of your changes:
Checklist:
cd manifests/testsmake generate-changed-onlymake test