Skip to content

[IBM] Add kfp-tekton deployment and update IBM stacks#1621

Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 2 commits into
kubeflow:masterfrom
Tomcli:master
Nov 10, 2020
Merged

[IBM] Add kfp-tekton deployment and update IBM stacks#1621
k8s-ci-robot merged 2 commits into
kubeflow:masterfrom
Tomcli:master

Conversation

@Tomcli

@Tomcli Tomcli commented Nov 9, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #

Description of your changes:

  1. Add new installs for kfp-tekton and kfp-tekton multi-user
  2. Update IBM Stacks to use kfp-tekton installs
  3. Update all IBM KfDef to use the "custom" stack style similar to the openshift kfdef. Removing the ibm_custom_stack.yaml since it's incorporated as part of the latest IBM kfdef.

Checklist:

  • Unit tests have been rebuilt:
    1. cd manifests/tests
    2. make generate-changed-only
    3. make test

@google-cla google-cla Bot added the cla: yes label Nov 9, 2020
@Tomcli

Tomcli commented Nov 9, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/cc @moficodes

@k8s-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Tomcli: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: moficodes.

Note that only kubeflow members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

Details

In response to this:

/cc @moficodes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Tomcli

Tomcli commented Nov 9, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/cc @animeshsingh

@animeshsingh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

cc @pvaneck for quick review

@pvaneck pvaneck left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey, looks good. Just a quick question. Do the YAML files in this PR reflect the resources listed here: https://github.com/kubeflow/kfp-tekton/blob/master/install/v0.4.0/kfp-tekton.yaml ? Noticed that some roles like ml-pipeline-persistenceagent-role were kind Role in that file but ClusterRole here, so I'm curious what prompts these changes in this manifests installation context.

Comment thread pipeline/installs/tekton/OWNERS Outdated
metadata:
name: minio
annotations:
sidecar.istio.io/inject: "false"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm curious. Were you were having sidecar issues?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For multi-user, the Kubeflow namespace needs to have sidecar injection. However, Minio is not suppose to have sidecar and this was done as part of the single ibm stack deployment. However, with the new independent application approach, I need to remove all the dependencies between each application. I put the annotations to our Minio overlays so that it can be deployed after the sidecar injection labels being patched in the previous applications.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm label Nov 10, 2020

@animeshsingh animeshsingh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 7f563d2 into kubeflow:master Nov 10, 2020

@moficodes moficodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: animeshsingh, moficodes, Tomcli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

k8s-ci-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2020
…and update IBM stacks (#1628)

* add kfp-tekton deployment and update IBM stacks

* update owner file

* pin ibm v1.2 manifests

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Animesh Singh <singhan@us.ibm.com>

Co-authored-by: Animesh Singh <singhan@us.ibm.com>
animeshsingh added a commit to animeshsingh/manifests that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2020
Will be responsible for maintaining manifests for KFServing, OpenShift, IKS etc.

PRs merged: 
kubeflow#1515
kubeflow#1575
kubeflow#1580
kubeflow#1617

Reviews:
kubeflow#1582
kubeflow#1621
kubeflow#1625
kubeflow#1627
kubeflow#1628
kubeflow/kfctl#419
k8s-ci-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2020
* Add Paul as a reviewer

Will be responsible for maintaining manifests for KFServing, OpenShift, IKS etc.

PRs merged: 
#1515
#1575
#1580
#1617

Reviews:
#1582
#1621
#1625
#1627
#1628
kubeflow/kfctl#419

* Update OWNERS
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants