Adding Openshift stack#1567
Conversation
crobby
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like its on the right path. Great work!
|
Metadata fail to start because metadata-db livenessprobe is failing. The liveness probe needs to use |
|
@vpavlin now I get this error below in on of the metadata-db pods that is showing up "not ready" then keeps crashing nevermind, I did a clean re-install and this issue is gone. |
|
/retest |
|
@jlewi @animeshsingh is there a way to get detailed logs from the kubeflow-manifests-presubmit job? Its failing and we have no indication why? |
|
Did you run test locally? seems Argo component doesn't load logs correctly. |
|
If you plan to have this in v1.2 release, please let us know kubeflow/kubeflow#5224 |
bd52bf0 to
16b0343
Compare
|
@PatrickXYS rebase done |
|
@nakfour: No presubmit jobs available for kubeflow/manifests@master DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
I'm in the process of trying this out on OpenShift 4.6 and it looks like Seldon will not work due to a known issue: #1543 |
|
I think notebooks spin-up is also failing due to the fact it's trying to use user/group ids that are not permitted in OpenShift. |
|
@crobby istio side car injection requires NET_ADMIN capability as described in this blog: https://www.openshift.com/blog/increasing-security-of-istio-deployments-by-removing-the-need-for-privileged-containers |
|
@PatrickXYS @Tomcli how can we get logs on what is failing in the e2e test? Running tests locally pass, and this stack is specific to Openshift cluster. |
|
thanks @nakfour |
|
Thanks @nakfour |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: animeshsingh, crobby, nakfour The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/unhold |
PRs: Manifest (kubeflow/community-distribution#1603) Website (kubeflow/website#1752) Reviews: Manifest(kubeflow/community-distribution#1621, kubeflow/community-distribution#1594, kubeflow/community-distribution#1582, kubeflow/community-distribution#1567) kfctl(kubeflow/kfctl#419) Website(kubeflow/website#2327) Issue Triage: kfctl(kubeflow/kfctl#428, kubeflow/kfctl#424, kubeflow/kfctl#418)
PRs: Manifest (kubeflow/community-distribution#1603) Website (kubeflow/website#1752) Reviews: Manifest(kubeflow/community-distribution#1621, kubeflow/community-distribution#1594, kubeflow/community-distribution#1582, kubeflow/community-distribution#1567) kfctl(kubeflow/kfctl#419) Website(kubeflow/website#2327) Issue Triage: kfctl(kubeflow/kfctl#428, kubeflow/kfctl#424, kubeflow/kfctl#418)
Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
This is to upgrade all changes needed to run Kubeflow on OCP 4.x to kustomize v3.
Resolves #
Description of your changes:
Checklist:
cd manifests/testsmake generate-changed-onlymake test