-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
.github/workflows: fix e2e-matrix-extras #9185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The problem was that the workflow was trying to use context.issue.number and github.event.issue.number, which aren't available in repository_dispatch events. Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <[email protected]>
|
@vdemeester: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: AlanGreene. Note that only tektoncd members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
khrm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
| owner: context.repo.owner, | ||
| repo: context.repo.repo, | ||
| pull_number: context.issue.number | ||
| pull_number: ${{ github.event.client_payload.github.payload.issue.number }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess I could use context.payload.client_payload.github.payload.issue.number as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
both fine
twoGiants
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
/lgtm
|
/e2e-extras |
|
Something went wrong with your [1]: |
|
Uhm, when routing commands, it doesn't pick up the version of the workflow from the PR, which makes it a problem for testing the slash commands themselves. We'll test it once it's merged. |
afrittoli
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: afrittoli, twoGiants The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Yeah.. it's a bit a shot in the dark. If it fails again, I'll replicate this on my workflow-experiments repo to figure out what happens. |
|
/retest |
Changes
The problem was that the workflow was trying to use
context.issue.number and github.event.issue.number, which aren't
available in repository_dispatch events.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester [email protected]
/kind misc
Submitter Checklist
As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:
/kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tepRelease Notes