Skip to content

OSDOCS-3467: Updated configuration-externalip.adoc for private cluster #96695

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2025

Conversation

dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

@dfitzmau dfitzmau commented Jul 25, 2025

Hold 4.16 to 4.12 updates until #95770 has been fully backported.

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-3467

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change (Chris Field / Renato Puccini).
  • QE has approved this change (Jean Chen).

Additional resources:

#87205

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-3467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-3467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-3467

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jul 25, 2025

🤖 Fri Jul 25 14:11:12 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://96695--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-3467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-3467

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-3467 branch 2 times, most recently from a229aa3 to 3828e47 Compare July 25, 2025 11:49
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-3467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-3467

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-3467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-3467

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-3467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-3467

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-3467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-3467

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-3467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-3467

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-3467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-3467

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change (Chris Field).
  • QE has approved this change (Weibin Liang).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-3467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-3467

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change (Chris Field / Renato Puccini).
  • QE has approved this change (Weibin Liang).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-3467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-3467

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change (Chris Field / Renato Puccini).
  • QE has approved this change (Weibin Liang).

Additional resources:

#87205

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@renatoppuccini
Copy link

LGTM

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dfitzmau: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@JoeAldinger
Copy link
Contributor

JoeAldinger commented Jul 31, 2025

/lgtm I'd wait to take this back past 4.17 till I merge the reorg. Then it'll just be a manual cp on 4.16 and you can take that the rest of the way back. Those xrefs are going to change at 4.16 just a heads up.

@dfitzmau dfitzmau merged commit 39ab22c into openshift:main Jul 31, 2025
2 checks passed
@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #96936

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #96937

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #96938

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #96939

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

dfitzmau commented Aug 1, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

dfitzmau commented Aug 1, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

dfitzmau commented Aug 1, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

dfitzmau commented Aug 1, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

dfitzmau commented Aug 1, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: #96695 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.16":

Applying: OSDOCS-3467: Updated configuration-externalip.adoc for private cluster
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.adoc
M	modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
A	networking/ingress_load_balancing/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging networking/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in networking/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
Auto-merging modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
Auto-merging modules/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OSDOCS-3467: Updated configuration-externalip.adoc for private cluster

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: #96695 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.15":

Applying: OSDOCS-3467: Updated configuration-externalip.adoc for private cluster
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.adoc
M	modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
A	networking/ingress_load_balancing/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging networking/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in networking/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
Auto-merging modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
Auto-merging modules/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OSDOCS-3467: Updated configuration-externalip.adoc for private cluster

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: #96695 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.14":

Applying: OSDOCS-3467: Updated configuration-externalip.adoc for private cluster
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.adoc
M	modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
A	networking/ingress_load_balancing/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging networking/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in networking/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
Auto-merging modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
Auto-merging modules/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OSDOCS-3467: Updated configuration-externalip.adoc for private cluster

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: #96695 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.13":

Applying: OSDOCS-3467: Updated configuration-externalip.adoc for private cluster
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.adoc
M	modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
A	networking/ingress_load_balancing/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging networking/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in networking/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/configuring-externalip.adoc
Auto-merging modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/installation-initializing-manual.adoc
Auto-merging modules/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OSDOCS-3467: Updated configuration-externalip.adoc for private cluster

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: #96695 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12":

Patch is empty.
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To record the empty patch as an empty commit, run "git am --allow-empty".
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.13 branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 branch/enterprise-4.20 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants