Skip to content

Conversation

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

picks up assorted updates ahead of v0.31.0

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 12, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 12, 2025
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

we could update again with #3965 but I think it's not critical


// Image defines the loadbalancer image:tag
const Image = "docker.io/kindest/haproxy:v20230606-42a2262b"
const Image = "docker.io/kindest/haproxy:v20251211-v0.29.0-alpha-100-g82a92c5d"
Copy link
Member Author

@BenTheElder BenTheElder Dec 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

smoke tested locally, seems fine.

$ cat $HOME/kind-ha.yaml 
kind: Cluster
apiVersion: kind.x-k8s.io/v1alpha4
nodes:
- role: control-plane
- role: control-plane
- role: control-plane

$ kind create cluster --config=$HOME/kind-ha.yaml 
Creating cluster "kind" ...
 ✓ Ensuring node image (kindest/node:v1.34.2) 🖼 
 ✓ Preparing nodes 📦 📦 📦  
 ✓ Configuring the external load balancer ⚖️ 
 ✓ Writing configuration 📜 
 ✓ Starting control-plane 🕹️ 
 ✓ Installing CNI 🔌 
 ✓ Installing StorageClass 💾 
 ✓ Joining more control-plane nodes 🎮 
Set kubectl context to "kind-kind"
You can now use your cluster with:

kubectl cluster-info --context kind-kind

Not sure what to do next? 😅  Check out https://kind.sigs.k8s.io/docs/user/quick-start/

$ kubectl get po -A
NAMESPACE            NAME                                          READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
kube-system          coredns-66bc5c9577-26ct8                      1/1     Running   0          50s
kube-system          coredns-66bc5c9577-sw2p8                      1/1     Running   0          50s
kube-system          etcd-kind-control-plane                       1/1     Running   0          58s
kube-system          etcd-kind-control-plane2                      1/1     Running   0          24s
kube-system          etcd-kind-control-plane3                      1/1     Running   0          14s
kube-system          kindnet-86km5                                 1/1     Running   0          16s
kube-system          kindnet-qnkn8                                 1/1     Running   0          26s
kube-system          kindnet-xks7f                                 1/1     Running   0          50s
kube-system          kube-apiserver-kind-control-plane             1/1     Running   0          58s
kube-system          kube-apiserver-kind-control-plane2            1/1     Running   0          24s
kube-system          kube-apiserver-kind-control-plane3            1/1     Running   0          14s
kube-system          kube-controller-manager-kind-control-plane    1/1     Running   0          58s
kube-system          kube-controller-manager-kind-control-plane2   1/1     Running   0          24s
kube-system          kube-controller-manager-kind-control-plane3   1/1     Running   0          14s
kube-system          kube-proxy-f6mvv                              1/1     Running   0          26s
kube-system          kube-proxy-s4nj7                              1/1     Running   0          16s
kube-system          kube-proxy-vvtk5                              1/1     Running   0          50s
kube-system          kube-scheduler-kind-control-plane             1/1     Running   0          58s
kube-system          kube-scheduler-kind-control-plane2            1/1     Running   0          24s
kube-system          kube-scheduler-kind-control-plane3            1/1     Running   0          14s
local-path-storage   local-path-provisioner-5c4cdb564f-cfbcj       1/1     Running   0          49s

@stmcginnis
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 12, 2025
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

Ah, that's going to be a problem ...

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

Only 1.33 is impacted, we can consider something like configuring CI to skip these tests on 1.33, but we need to discuss in kubernetes/kubernetes#135214


// Image is the default for the Config.Image field, aka the default node image.
const Image = "kindest/node:v1.34.0@sha256:7416a61b42b1662ca6ca89f02028ac133a309a2a30ba309614e8ec94d976dc5a"
const Image = "kindest/node:v1.34.2@sha256:745f8ed46d8e99517774768227fd1a0af34a6bf395aef9c7ed98fbce0e263918"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should do 1.34.3

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 15, 2025
@BenTheElder BenTheElder changed the title updating all images to latest WIP: updating all images to latest Dec 15, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 15, 2025
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

trying runc 1.2.x in CI here

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, so we can use runc 1.2.x as a stopgap, but eventually this is a problem because we're not aligned with containerd, and runc is already on 1.4.0 now.

We really need a better solution to kubernetes/kubernetes#135214

@BenTheElder BenTheElder changed the title WIP: updating all images to latest updating all images to latest Dec 16, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 16, 2025
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

/retest pull-kind-e2e-kubernetes-1-31

seems to be a minor flake, one test case

@k8s-ci-robot

This comment was marked as resolved.

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@stmcginnis
Copy link
Contributor

Jobs are happy, looks good.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, stmcginnis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [BenTheElder,stmcginnis]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c17c183 into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 17, 2025
30 of 43 checks passed
@BenTheElder BenTheElder deleted the latest-images branch December 17, 2025 01:54
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

ceffaf4

We upgraded to runc 1.3.0 in kind v0.28, so this kind of stinks, but it is a ~fully patched runc release that does not break 1.33 tests.

If I had more time, I'd fix the 1.33 tests, but I want to get us ready for k8s 1.35, and runc 1.2.9 should be OK for now.

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

Thankfully after that we did not upgrade again until a5cac99 which never released, so hopefully it's not a big deal in the short term.

1.2.x will be losing support though, so we do have to move once the tests are sorted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants