You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There was a difference in changes.jelly between Jenkins core and pipelines (workflow-job-plugin). This PR merges them, so we can do away with the now duplicated code in workflow-job.
Widget code now works and displays changes on the Overview tab
Changes summary now hides in the experimental Run UI
Changes link no longer visible in overflow menu in experimental Run UI
Before
After
Users won't see this tab, but I've updated the UI just in case they navigate directly to the URL
Testing done
Freestyle jobs show their changes as expected
The widget now works as expected
Proposed changelog entries
Refine Changes for the experimental Run UI
Proposed changelog category
/label web-ui,rfe
Proposed upgrade guidelines
N/A
Submitter checklist
The Jira issue, if it exists, is well-described.
The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
UI changes do not introduce regressions when enforcing the current default rules of Content Security Policy Plugin. In particular, new or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.
Desired reviewers
@jenkinsci/sig-ux
Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:
Maintainer checklist
There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).
comment-ops-botbot
added
web-ui
The PR includes WebUI changes which may need special expertise
rfe
For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted
labels
Nov 8, 2025
Sorry for commenting here, but I don't have no Jira account actually.
Using the new Run UI I'm missing the list of artifacts attached to the Run.
Same for the Job UI where the artifacts of the last successful Run were shown in the past.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ready-for-mergeThe PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedbackrfeFor changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlightedsquash-merge-meUnclean or useless commit history, should be merged only with squash-mergeweb-uiThe PR includes WebUI changes which may need special expertise
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Feedback
If you have feedback the recommended place to provide it is jenkinsci/sig-ux#7 or https://community.jenkins.io/t/a-redesigned-build-page-let-me-know-your-thoughts/35596/10
There was a difference in
changes.jellybetween Jenkins core and pipelines (workflow-job-plugin). This PR merges them, so we can do away with the now duplicated code inworkflow-job.Core (before this PR)
Source: https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/blob/master/core/src/main/resources/hudson/model/AbstractBuild/changes.jelly
workflow-job
Source: https://github.com/jenkinsci/workflow-job-plugin/blob/master/src/main/resources/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/job/WorkflowRun/changes.jelly
Before

After

Users won't see this tab, but I've updated the UI just in case they navigate directly to the URL
Testing done
Proposed changelog entries
Proposed changelog category
/label web-ui,rfe
Proposed upgrade guidelines
N/A
Submitter checklist
@Restrictedor have@since TODOJavadocs, as appropriate.@Deprecated(since = "TODO")or@Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.evalto ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).Desired reviewers
@jenkinsci/sig-ux
Before the changes are marked as
ready-for-merge:Maintainer checklist
upgrade-guide-neededlabel is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).lts-candidateto be considered (see query).