Skip to content

Fix typo. #4483

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2025
Merged

Fix typo. #4483

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion specification/dartLangSpec.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6042,7 +6042,7 @@ \subsection{Mixin Declaration}
\Index{superinvocation interface} of the mixin declaration $M$.
\commentary{%
If the mixin declaration $M$ has only one declared superinterface, $T_1$,
then the superinvocation interface $M_{super}$ has exactly the same members
then the superinvocation interface $M_S$ has exactly the same members
Copy link
Member

@eernstg eernstg Aug 7, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch, @eugenefil!

An interface is a set of member signatures. Every interface type (including class types) has a uniquely determined interface, which means that there is no doubt what "the interface $M_{super}$" means, namely, the interface of the class whose name is denoted by the symbol $M_{super}$. We usually say "the interface of" a given class, and the interface usually doesn't have its own designator (but here we have explicitly named it as $M_S$). So it doesn't really say anything wrong, but it abuses the terminology slightly. $M_S$ is better.

as the interface $T_1$.%
}

Expand Down