Skip to content

Conversation

@1024th
Copy link
Contributor

@1024th 1024th commented Nov 12, 2025

This shifts j rightward and i slightly leftward. The diagonal-tailed j in the Aile version is also wider.

Also remove the outdated dfHook in Body.DiagonalTailed of lower-j. It looks that the correct DivFrame is chosen later in JConfig.

But the dfHook in Body.FlatHook of lower-j remains unchanged, because I don't quite understand the code.

@be5invis
Copy link
Owner

j may need some alternative spacing settings

'bentHookSerifless' { "BentHook" Serifs.None XMiddle.BentHook Marks.Serifless Div.BentHook }
'bentHookShortSerifed' { "BentHook" Serifs.Short XMiddle.BentHook Marks.Serifless Div.BentHook }
'bentHookSerifed' { "BentHook" Serifs.Long XMiddle.BentHook Marks.Serifed Div.BentHook }
'diagonalTailedSerifless' { "DiagonalTailed" Serifs.None XMiddle.BentHook Marks.Serifless Div.BentHook }
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Current space is too large. Need to compress it a little.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@1024th 1024th Nov 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about using the width of advanceScaleF and XMiddle of df.middle + [IBalance2 df] for diagonal-tailed j? Preview:

Copy link
Contributor Author

@1024th 1024th Nov 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As a comparison, this is the preview of using advanceScaleI and df.middle + [IBalance2 df]:
屏幕截图_20251117_003910

My fault. advanceScaleI looks better than advanceScaleF.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

advanceScaleI looks much better.

@be5invis be5invis enabled auto-merge (squash) November 17, 2025 01:42
@be5invis be5invis merged commit e56e2b3 into be5invis:dev Nov 17, 2025
5 checks passed
@Logo121 Logo121 mentioned this pull request Nov 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants