Skip to content

Refactor Constraints #1004

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 22, 2025
Merged

Refactor Constraints #1004

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 22, 2025

Conversation

Tigrov
Copy link
Member

@Tigrov Tigrov commented Jul 21, 2025

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.95%. Comparing base (6f0ad98) to head (56b0902).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1004      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     98.96%   98.95%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     1641     1622      -19     
============================================
  Files           100       99       -1     
  Lines          4167     4116      -51     
============================================
- Hits           4124     4073      -51     
  Misses           43       43              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Tigrov Tigrov requested a review from a team July 21, 2025 15:18
@Tigrov Tigrov added the status:code review The pull request needs review. label Jul 21, 2025
@Tigrov Tigrov merged commit 9f54f4b into master Jul 22, 2025
68 checks passed
@Tigrov Tigrov deleted the refactor-constraints branch July 22, 2025 17:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status:code review The pull request needs review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants