Skip to content

Minimizing the extent of profiling of requestors #95

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
peacekeeper opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Minimizing the extent of profiling of requestors #95

peacekeeper opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
pr-exists There is an open PR to address this issue. privacy Issue related to privacy.

Comments

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Collaborator

This issue is created based on #81 (comment) by @mccown, which I am copying here:

Resolvers, inherently, provide a natural point where the resolver provider can log requests and use them for tracking or profiling. One sub-section worth adding might be a short discussion on ways that resolutions could be performed while also minimizing the extent by which requestors could be profiled.

@peacekeeper peacekeeper added the privacy Issue related to privacy. label Nov 14, 2024
@peacekeeper peacekeeper added the ready-for-pr Issue is ready for a PR label Feb 27, 2025
@w3cbot
Copy link

w3cbot commented Feb 27, 2025

This was discussed during the #did meeting on 27 February 2025.

View the transcript

w3c/did-resolution#95

Minimizing the extent of profiling of requestors #95

wip: is there an action on this one?

<manu> +1 privacy considerations

markus_sabadello: yes this came up in November, its newer...

markus_sabadello: I think its still valid, perhaps to be addressed in the security considerations...

wip: ok sounds good...

wip: ok last thing I want to mention....

wip: about the APAC call... I have moved to an EU friendly time...

wip: it will be interesting to see who from the APAC time zone joins...


@wip-abramson wip-abramson self-assigned this Jun 10, 2025
@wip-abramson wip-abramson added pr-exists There is an open PR to address this issue. and removed ready-for-pr Issue is ready for a PR labels Jun 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-exists There is an open PR to address this issue. privacy Issue related to privacy.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants