Skip to content

[RFC]: Support asynchronous put and get #934

@amy-why-3459

Description

@amy-why-3459

Motivation.

Synchronous put and get may cause a performance bottleneck in high concurrency scenarios.

Proposed Change.

Please provide the detailed design document of the RFC using the template.

Feedback Period.

No response

CC List.

No response

Any Other Things.

No response

Before submitting a new issue...

  • Make sure you already searched for relevant issues, and asked the chatbot living at the bottom right corner of the documentation page, which can answer lots of frequently asked questions.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions