-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
vtgate: ignore MySQL client probe query select $$ in querylog
#20073
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
ChaitanyaD48
wants to merge
2
commits into
vitessio:main
from
ChaitanyaD48:fix/vtgate-ignore-mysql-probe-query
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO... clients can send whatever queries they want. It's not up to the Vitess developers to decide what should and should not be logged. It's a log of queries coming from clients.
And IMO every Vitess user should not pay the cost of an EqualFold on every query just to elide it. The use case in the issue was:
IMO we should not modify how Vitess behaves for all users simply so that it fits better into that very narrow use case / scenario, especially when there seems to be a pretty clear performance cost.
Am I missing or misunderstanding something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What might make sense though... is providing a Viper config option that allowed users to specify a set of SQL query shapes to ignore in the logs. What do you think about that? Then a user could specify this specific query and any others coming from their clients that they want to elide from the vtgate logs.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mattlord Thanks for the review! Its a Good Idea to have a user configurable viper config option to ignore a set of SQL Query shapes in Logs.
I have some questions around this -
Question 1: How should we "match" a query?
Should we match by normalized shape or exact string? In case of Reading "query shape" as the output of
sqlparser.RedactSQLQuery,select 31239andselect 99999would both collapse to a single entry likeselect :vtg1but,select $$itself doesn't parse, so RedactSQLQuery fails on it. We'd need a fallback for the un-parseable cases. The options I see:Which approach do you think makes more sense?
And Addressing your performance Concern. I feel this new user-configurable viper config option must sit at the executor level in vtgate, not inside streamlog's
ShouldEmitLog. Planning to go with alen() == 0fast path something like -for users who don't opt in pay essentially nothing (one int compare), and users who do pay a single map lookup per query. That should keep the cost off everyone except the operators who actually asked for it.
What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should do it by shape or the normalized form where the variable parts are replaced by a placeholder.
For the performance part, that sounds good. Thanks! ❤️
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it, thanks @mattlord!
I've created a new issue (#20173) and opened a PR (#20174) for the proposed change.
Closing this PR.