Skip to content

Conversation

@timvaillancourt
Copy link
Contributor

@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt commented Dec 19, 2025

Description

Add support for proxying FullStatus RPCs, in order for VTOrc to gain the ability to validate certain problems using many cells (locations) and detect network partitions - this will happen in future PRs (possibly v24), for now having this RPC in v24 will be helpful

Support for this is intentionally not added to vtctldclient GetFullStatus, because it's intended for internal VTOrc usage and I can't think of a good use case for someone at a CLI to need this

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

AI Disclosure

Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt added Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature) Component: VTorc Vitess Orchestrator integration Component: VTTablet labels Dec 19, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v24.0.0 milestone Dec 19, 2025
@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Dec 19, 2025
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Dec 19, 2025
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
This reverts commit ac3739c.

Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 6514720.

Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Component: VTorc Vitess Orchestrator integration Component: VTTablet Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant