geolocation-!cn: include more sub lists

[MkQtS]

They are part of Chinese entities but exclusively serving for non-cn area

As #3198 moved them out from category-xxx-cn/geolocation-cn, this adds them into category-xxx-!cn/geolocation-!cn

If there's no objection, I'll merge this in a week

[nekolsd]

What are we doing here bro, the category-companies list states that

This list contains Tech & Cyber companies and organizations outside China mainland.

Adding domains of China mainland-based companies that serve non-cn area into this list doesn't make sense. These domains still belong to Chinese companies, not foreign ones — this contradicts the list's own description and makes the categorization misleading.

This probably goes back to how the project categorized things in the first place — some lists may have been poorly named from the start. But that's not a reason to make it worse by adding more mismatched entries.

don't do this bro

[MkQtS]

Adding domains of China mainland-based companies that serve non-cn area into this list doesn't make sense

Well, I thought these domains are used by their foreign subsidiary which may considered as non-cn companies. geolocation-!cn is a bit too generic, and these lists match the Tech & Cyber companies topic, so I added them to category-companies.

I can add them directly in geolocation-!cn, or create a new list like category-non-domestic-cn-companies(the name may be shorter...). That's not a problem.

Beyond this naming/categorization detail, actually, I am more concerned about whether this change is reasonable/necessary. I think removing @!cn domain rules out from category-xxx-cn is quite reasonable. But after this, I found the change appears to diminish the value of these removed domains(originally cn@!cn domains) as they were removed from big categories but not added to new ones. I had a feeling that since I was the one who drove them away, it should be my responsibility to find them a place to go. So it may be a choice to add them into geolocation-!cn families.

TBH, I don't like the idea to add all @cn domains to geolocation-cn and all @!cn to geolocation-!cn. It doesn't make sense to treat google@cn domains as part of cn domains. Similarly, I'm puzzled about the necessity of adding cn@!cn into -!cn lists.

Do you have any suggestions about that? Feel free to share your ideas.