Skip to content

Conversation

@nolouch
Copy link
Contributor

@nolouch nolouch commented Apr 8, 2018

the balance region may alloc peer but do not produce operator.

@nolouch nolouch requested review from Connor1996 and disksing April 8, 2018 03:28
Copy link
Member

@Connor1996 Connor1996 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

// SelectBestReplacedPeerToAddReplica returns a new peer that to be used to replace the old peer and distinct score.
func (r *ReplicaChecker) SelectBestReplacedPeerToAddReplica(region *core.RegionInfo, oldPeer *metapb.Peer, filters ...Filter) *metapb.Peer {
storeID, _ := r.selectBestReplacementStore(region, oldPeer, filters...)
storeID, _ := r.SelectBestReplacementStore(region, oldPeer, filters...)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can remove the function SelectBestReplacedPeerToAddReplica to prevent we misuse it later.

}
newPeer, err := r.cluster.AllocPeer(storeID)
if err != nil {
log.Info("alloc peer meet error:", err)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can use log.Error.

}
newPeer, err := r.cluster.AllocPeer(storeID)
if err != nil {
log.Info("alloc peer meet error:", err)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto.

@nolouch
Copy link
Contributor Author

nolouch commented Apr 9, 2018

PTAL @disksing

}
newPeer, err := cluster.AllocPeer(storeID)
if err != nil {
schedulerCounter.WithLabelValues(s.GetName(), "no_peer").Inc()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

return nil?

}
newPeer, err := r.cluster.AllocPeer(storeID)
if err != nil {
log.Error("alloc peer meet error:", err)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a second thought here. It seems better to move the log into AllocPeer function.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, I check that found has already printed.

Copy link
Contributor

@disksing disksing left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@disksing
Copy link
Contributor

/run-all-tests

@nolouch nolouch merged commit 3ea73bb into tikv:master Apr 10, 2018
@nolouch nolouch deleted the fix-alloc branch April 10, 2018 02:47
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /tools/pd-tso-bench (#5990)

ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /tests/client (#5992)

ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref #987, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150, ref #4399

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ti-chi-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /tests/mcs (#5993)

ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref #987, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150, ref #4399

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ti Chi Robot <[email protected]>
ti-chi-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /client (#5991)

ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref #987, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150, ref #4399

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ti Chi Robot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants