Skip to content

fix(redis): Use wait strategy instead of deprecated decorator#914

Open
mschmitzer wants to merge 3 commits intotestcontainers:mainfrom
solute:redis-wait-strategy
Open

fix(redis): Use wait strategy instead of deprecated decorator#914
mschmitzer wants to merge 3 commits intotestcontainers:mainfrom
solute:redis-wait-strategy

Conversation

@mschmitzer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Another part of fixing #874 (cf. #899).

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.05%. Comparing base (87332c1) to head (3916302).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #914      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.24%   83.05%   +3.81%     
==========================================
  Files          15       16       +1     
  Lines        1277     1700     +423     
  Branches      154      186      +32     
==========================================
+ Hits         1012     1412     +400     
- Misses        219      234      +15     
- Partials       46       54       +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@alesdakshanin
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey there! Is this PR going to get merged? Maybe any help needed to get things moving?

@alexanderankin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

please allow maintainer push to your branch or replace the content of your branch with this branch contents

https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-python/pull/new/redis-wait-strategy-rebase - that should resolve the issues

@mschmitzer mschmitzer force-pushed the redis-wait-strategy branch from b5f854f to 3916302 Compare April 7, 2026 06:36
@mschmitzer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@alexanderankin , sorry, I was offline a couple of days. I have updated the branch as requested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🔧 fix 👀 intend to merge this or some version of it 🛠️ needs more work Need to invest more time, can be a rebase or code updates

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants