Skip to content

Conversation

adrian-prantl
Copy link

@adrian-prantl adrian-prantl commented Jun 12, 2020

rdar://problem/64169273

@adrian-prantl
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test

Comment on lines +828 to +829
$(SWIFTC) $(patsubst -g,,$(SWIFTFLAGS)) -toolchain-stdlib-rpath \
-emit-library $(DYLIB_SWIFT_FLAGS) -o $@ \

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need this option? We should run all our tests with the right DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH already

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wasn't aware of that we did that. This seems to be better to me though, since it allows manually running and debugging the test binaries, (not just through dotest) which is something I often do.
Slightly more concerning though: I had to add this option in order to get the test in rdar://64169273 to work. That might be worth investigating.

@adrian-prantl adrian-prantl merged commit f1b81d2 into swiftlang:swift/release/5.3 Jun 15, 2020
eeckstein added a commit to eeckstein/swift that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2020
…builds.

This was blocked by an LLDB problem, which is now fixed (swiftlang/llvm-project#1333)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants