Suspicious highlights

[EgorBu]

Hi,
I noticed at pair 6 something suspicious.
Code & comments are the same in both samples but everything is marked as changed (even without reusing of anything that can happen in case of some changes).
Screen is below

If it's because of some changes like new line windows \r\n-> linux \n it could be worth to add Show whitespaces button or show them by default

[smacker]

Duplicate of #113

I suggested it because of invisible symbols but it's just a guess. We need to check.

[EgorBu]

Thank you, I could not find a similar issue. I (or you) can close issue as duplicated if you wish

[EgorBu]

Pair number 6, 19, 22, 29, 54, 57, 104, 111, 115, 159, 183, 187, 210, 217, 261, 268, 284, 305, 318, 337, 338, 369, 378, 379, 387, 388, 394, 451, 475, 476, 499, 504, 505, 507 (lines 198 to 203, 252 to 266), 583, 594, 640, 649, 674, 700, 704, 730, 744, 757, 758 (strange diff beahviour), 787, 814, 833, 834, 838, 852, 871, 873, 879, 881, 897, 986, 1004, 1011, 1018, 1128, 1237, 1371, 1426, 1428, 1429, 1459, 1462 have the same confusing highlights.
I will track of suspicious pairs in this comment

In some cases, it makes almost impossible to put a correct label.
Ex: pair 394 - were comments changed? Or something else too? There are several hundred lines, so it's hard to bisect correctly changes manually

[smacker]

Just few examples with replaced invisible characters:

Number 6:

Number 29: