Better sizes for StringBuilder #3813
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
StringBuilder by default has a size of 16, however there are some places that already create larger strings already. For efficiency and garbage reduction it would be better to have larger sizes to begin with.
fmbenhassine
added
has: backports
fmbenhassine
added
for: backport-to-4.2.x
|
LGTM. Rebased and merged as e9bdcc6. Thank you for your contribution! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
StringBuilder by default has a size of 16, however there
are some places that already create larger strings already.
For efficiency and garbage reduction it would be better to have
larger sizes to begin with.