Skip to content

Custom configuration support#118

Merged
abeatrix merged 4 commits intomainfrom
piotr/custom-configuration-option
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Custom configuration support#118
abeatrix merged 4 commits intomainfrom
piotr/custom-configuration-option

Conversation

@PiotrKarczmarz
Copy link
Contributor

@PiotrKarczmarz PiotrKarczmarz commented Oct 18, 2024

CLOSE https://linear.app/sourcegraph/issue/CODY-4103/allows-user-to-use-options-page-for-json-customconfiguration

Example custom configuration for Tools->Cody->Cody Settings:

{
  'cody.autocomplete.enabled': false,
  'cody.experimental.urlContext': true
}

…iguration class:

  - Added UI to the options page
  - Custom configuration provided on UI should be valid JSON, like:

{
  'cody.autocomplete.enabled': false,
  'cody.experimental.urlContext': true
}
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Test Results

10 tests  ±0   10 ✅ ±0   2m 16s ⏱️ -26s
 1 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0    0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 708df8c. ± Comparison against base commit e742b5e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@abeatrix abeatrix merged commit f3ac8d9 into main Oct 18, 2024
@abeatrix abeatrix deleted the piotr/custom-configuration-option branch October 18, 2024 17:02
PiotrKarczmarz added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
Introduced Cody.Core.Tests project with first unit tests for Custom Configuration serialization validation (#118)
tomaszgolebiowski pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
CLOSE
https://linear.app/sourcegraph/issue/CODY-4103/allows-user-to-use-options-page-for-json-customconfiguration

Example custom configuration for Tools->Cody->Cody Settings:

```
{
  'cody.autocomplete.enabled': false,
  'cody.experimental.urlContext': true
}
```
tomaszgolebiowski pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
Introduced Cody.Core.Tests project with first unit tests for Custom Configuration serialization validation (#118)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants