Skip to content

Clarify constraint trait enforcement#1902

Merged
mtdowling merged 1 commit intomainfrom
clarify-constraint-enforcement
Aug 2, 2023
Merged

Clarify constraint trait enforcement#1902
mtdowling merged 1 commit intomainfrom
clarify-constraint-enforcement

Conversation

@mtdowling
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes #1039

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@mtdowling mtdowling requested a review from a team as a code owner August 2, 2023 16:21
violation would prevent a client from observing a state change of the server
and would provide no real recourse for the client or server to recover.


Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A link or note to this section would be helpful here, some users get confused as of why they can build invalid structs.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I try not to link from the normative spec out of the spec to non-normative content

@mtdowling mtdowling merged commit 0f2ab35 into main Aug 2, 2023
@mtdowling mtdowling deleted the clarify-constraint-enforcement branch September 11, 2023 18:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Question concerning constraint traits when applied to output shapes

2 participants