removed min() function for RescalePair()#265
Merged
mwoss merged 3 commits intoshopspring:masterfrom Jan 15, 2024
Merged
Conversation
mwoss
reviewed
Dec 8, 2021
Member
mwoss
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall nice optimization, I have not thought about that during the implementation.
Sorry for not working CI, Travis.org is unresponsive. I tried to contact them a few times about open-source credits. Probably I would have to move to another open-source friendly CI service.
added 2 commits
December 13, 2021 10:26
Contributor
Author
|
@mwoss I fixed the tests. Thanks for catching that. As far as CI environments, for public projects CircleCI is pretty easy to setup and has a free tier. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removing the
min()func fromRescalePair()stops the copy operation for passing the values intomin()saving on the bytes per op and marginal decreases in runtime. For fun I implemented the new implementation into a newAdd()func and it looks like the effect is doubled.