Skip to content

plugin trio-dnm2 with deepvariant vcf #2484

@fcliquet

Description

@fcliquet

Hi,

I am trying to move my workflow to this plugin for DNM calls, and noticed something strange in my test dataset. The bcf is produced by calling 3 samples as gVCF using deepvariant before doing a family call using GLnexus.

my command is :
bcftools +trio-dnm2 -P pedigree.tsv data.vcf --with-pAD

produce this line (the samples are the parents followed by the child) :
chr11 70486013 chr11_70486013_C_CG C CG 29 . AF=0.166667;AQ=29 GT:DP:AD:GQ:PL:RNC:DNM:VA:VAF 0/0:30:30,0:48:0,48,959:..:.:.:0 0/0:31:31,0:50:0,120,1439:..:.:.:0 0/1:47:29,18:30:29,0,65:..:-11.7432:1:38

We do know that this variant is true, it was validated with Sanger sequencing.

the DNM score appears awfully low when we have good values supporting the DNM.

  • Is it because deepvariant is coding its PL differently?
  • if so, is there a way to fix this?
  • Should I just skip this and use the naive approach and add criteria on the DP and VAF?

thanks a lot for your help,

Freddy

I attached here the test dataset (and added a .txt for the vcf file for github to accept it):

data.vcf.txt
pedigree.tsv

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions