0.104.0: Take MSRV of 1.83

[ctz]

Treating this as a breaking change out of caution, as the previous (and new) MSRV doesn't have a MSRV-aware resolver.

re #377

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.44%. Comparing base (94d957c) to head (5be3852).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #388   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.44%   97.44%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        4104     4104           
=======================================
  Hits         3999     3999           
  Misses        105      105           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[djc]

Should we hold off on merging this for a little bit, until we get feedback on the EKU validation API and can merge it?

[cpu]

Thanks!

[djc]

Should merge the following before we release:

• Remove deprecated Error variants #391
• Simplify/clarify extended key usage validation API #392

See also:

• 0.104.x release planning #377

[djc]

Treating this as a breaking change out of caution, as the previous (and new) MSRV doesn't have a MSRV-aware resolver.

I don't think doing a breaking change just for the MSRV makes sense, as that is uncommon for the ecosystem (MSRV-aware resolver or not). But we have some actually breaking changes that will help.