Skip to content

Nominating non-local lifetimes (daddy borrowck) for meeting discussion  #85

@SoniEx2

Description

@SoniEx2

RFC PR rust-lang/rfcs#3390 we'd like to see t-types thoughts on the way we reject empty lifetimes and define lifetimes which may already be expired. The main concern is how these interact with the type system, while the interaction with code is fairly straightforward.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions