Archive wg-traits and create types team #760
Conversation
|
cc @wesleywiser and @pnkfelix since we'll want approval from the compiler team before merging. The failure in CI is from here. We have a validation that all people in the Team repo are at least on one team. However, this does not take into account archived teams. I believe the right thing to do is to update this logic to all consider archived teams, but I'd like to check with @pietroalbini first. |
|
Is the RFC not approval? And why compiler and not lang? (If it's because the labeled subteam, then it really should be both and this is just a limitation of the team repo) Let me know if I need to make a PR to fix the archived team issue. |
|
@jackh726 There is a lot of chance for things to happen in the meantime that could materially impact whether this should be merged or not. I think it's a safer to ensure that team leads are made aware when there is a membership change in their team or a related subteam. The point about lang is a good one. cc @nikomatsakis @joshtriplett |
|
Thoughts on me dropping |
|
So, since what to do with archived teams is a bit of a bigger question what I'd do is keep the wg-traits team around but remove it from the website and all the actual permissions, ideally with a todo comment. That way we don't lose any data until we figure out what to do with archived teams. |
|
Okay, I can move it back to a regular team. Do I just remove the |
|
That, and also |
|
Updated for reviews |
|
This looks great, thanks @jackh726 for preparing it |
|
Anything else that needs to be done for this to be merged? |
Also, welcome @compiler-errors (officially).
Zulip and github things should be renamed before this is merged.