Skip to content

Conversation

johnthagen
Copy link
Contributor

As best I can tell, this was a typo due to how similar it looks to the function above it. PyCharm found this as a unbound local variable.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 9, 2017

📌 Commit 430e875 has been approved by alexcrichton

@carols10cents carols10cents added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 9, 2017
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2017
…alexcrichton

Fix variable name reference

As best I can tell, this was a typo due to how similar it looks to the function above it. PyCharm found this as a unbound local variable.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2017
Rollup of 9 pull requests

- Successful merges: #44962, #45051, #45091, #45106, #45117, #45118, #45120, #45125, #45136
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 430e875 into rust-lang:master Oct 10, 2017
@johnthagen johnthagen deleted the fix-section-key-name branch October 10, 2017 12:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants