Skip to content

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

Also, remove dupe example

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@carols10cents carols10cents added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 24, 2017
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

The example is duplicated on purpose, so that each thing has its own docs with examples.

I don't have any particular feelings about making it more concise, but the build is failing.

@tshepang
Copy link
Member Author

looks like a spurious failure

@tshepang
Copy link
Member Author

I will leave it duplicated then

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

r? @steveklabnik

Mind reviewing this Steve?

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned steveklabnik and unassigned brson Jul 27, 2017
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 28, 2017

📌 Commit 42dae9d has been approved by steveklabnik

frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2017
doc: make into_iter example more concise

Also, remove dupe example
Mark-Simulacrum added a commit to Mark-Simulacrum/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2017
doc: make into_iter example more concise

Also, remove dupe example
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2017
Rollup of 8 pull requests

- Successful merges: #43409, #43501, #43509, #43512, #43513, #43536, #43544, #43549
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 42dae9d into rust-lang:master Jul 30, 2017
@tshepang tshepang deleted the concise branch July 30, 2017 06:41
@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Jul 31, 2017

@bors p=-2 (unblock bors)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants