Skip to content

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit 6adc2c1.

More precise subset of #139874.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 15, 2025

r? @oli-obk

rustbot has assigned @oli-obk.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 15, 2025
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=compiler-errors #139874 (comment)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 15, 2025

📌 Commit 38f7060 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 15, 2025
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors rollup=never

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

👍

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 15, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 38f7060 with merge cacb9ee...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 16, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing cacb9ee to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 16, 2025
@bors bors merged commit cacb9ee into rust-lang:master Apr 16, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.88.0 milestone Apr 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 38c560a (parent) -> cacb9ee (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Job duration changes

  1. x86_64-apple-2: 4916.9s -> 6496.4s (32.1%)
  2. dist-apple-various: 9698.1s -> 7598.2s (-21.7%)
  3. x86_64-apple-1: 7372.0s -> 8666.2s (17.6%)
  4. i686-msvc-2: 8365.0s -> 7330.6s (-12.4%)
  5. i686-gnu-nopt-2: 7147.5s -> 6389.4s (-10.6%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-2: 6189.7s -> 5575.7s (-9.9%)
  7. dist-x86_64-mingw: 7476.1s -> 8073.2s (8.0%)
  8. armhf-gnu: 4772.0s -> 4405.1s (-7.7%)
  9. dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl: 5472.6s -> 5099.3s (-6.8%)
  10. dist-loongarch64-linux: 6308.7s -> 6605.6s (4.7%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (cacb9ee): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-5.8% [-12.9%, -0.6%] 11
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.9% [-8.7%, -0.3%] 34
All ❌✅ (primary) -5.8% [-12.9%, -0.6%] 11

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.3%, secondary 7.5%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.9% [0.4%, 3.0%] 7
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
7.5% [7.5%, 7.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.9% [-4.6%, -0.8%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.3% [-4.6%, 3.0%] 10

Cycles

Results (primary -2.9%, secondary -0.5%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.4% [0.4%, 0.4%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.4% [2.4%, 2.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-4.0% [-10.7%, -0.4%] 6
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.9% [-2.3%, -1.6%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.9% [-10.7%, 0.4%] 8

Binary size

Results (primary -7.4%, secondary -10.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-7.4% [-15.2%, -0.9%] 16
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-10.0% [-10.3%, -7.9%] 37
All ❌✅ (primary) -7.4% [-15.2%, -0.9%] 16

Bootstrap: 781.698s -> 782.111s (0.05%)
Artifact size: 365.13 MiB -> 364.73 MiB (-0.11%)

@petrochenkov petrochenkov added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Apr 16, 2025
@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

Beta backport approved as per compiler team on Zulip. A backport PR will be authored by the release team at the end of the current development cycle. Backport labels handled by them.

@rustbot label +beta-accepted

@rustbot rustbot added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Apr 17, 2025
@cuviper cuviper mentioned this pull request Apr 17, 2025
@cuviper cuviper modified the milestones: 1.88.0, 1.87.0 Apr 17, 2025
@cuviper cuviper removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Apr 17, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2025
[beta] backports

- Fix 2024 edition doctest panic output rust-lang#139328
- make `Arguments::as_statically_known_str` doc(hidden) rust-lang#139389
- Revert "Deduplicate template parameter creation" rust-lang#139878
- sync::mpsc: prevent double free on `Drop` rust-lang#139553

r? cuviper
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants