Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/instance.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Instance<'tcx> {
if let Some(substs) = self.substs_for_mir_body() {
v.subst(tcx, substs)
} else {
v.skip_binder()
v.subst_identity()
}
}

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/shim.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ fn build_call_shim<'tcx>(
let mut sig = if let Some(sig_substs) = sig_substs {
sig.subst(tcx, &sig_substs)
} else {
sig.skip_binder()
sig.subst_identity()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I remember a similar pattern in Instance::subst_mir that I used skip_binder for previously:

pub fn subst_mir<T>(&self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, v: EarlyBinder<&T>) -> T
where
T: TypeFoldable<TyCtxt<'tcx>> + Copy,
{
let v = v.map_bound(|v| *v);
if let Some(substs) = self.substs_for_mir_body() {
v.subst(tcx, substs)
} else {
v.skip_binder()
}
}

Should that one also be subst_identity()?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, probably

};

if let CallKind::Indirect(fnty) = call_kind {
Expand Down
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions src/librustdoc/clean/blanket_impl.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -104,10 +104,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> BlanketImplFinder<'a, 'tcx> {
// the post-inference `trait_ref`, as it's more accurate.
trait_: Some(clean_trait_ref_with_bindings(
cx,
ty::Binder::dummy(trait_ref.skip_binder()),
ty::Binder::dummy(trait_ref.subst_identity()),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are some skip_binder lower down in this function too. Should those be subst_identity as well?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I believe so

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks, just updated the commit to add those 👍

ThinVec::new(),
)),
for_: clean_middle_ty(ty::Binder::dummy(ty.skip_binder()), cx, None),
for_: clean_middle_ty(ty::Binder::dummy(ty.subst_identity()), cx, None),
items: cx
.tcx
.associated_items(impl_def_id)
Expand All @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> BlanketImplFinder<'a, 'tcx> {
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
polarity: ty::ImplPolarity::Positive,
kind: ImplKind::Blanket(Box::new(clean_middle_ty(
ty::Binder::dummy(trait_ref.skip_binder().self_ty()),
ty::Binder::dummy(trait_ref.subst_identity().self_ty()),
cx,
None,
))),
Expand Down