Skip to content

Conversation

WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

r? @Nilstrieb

This should also lifts the need to think about safety from the callers (impl_tag! is robust (ish, see the macro issue)) and removes the possibility of making a "weird" Tag impl.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 20, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@Noratrieb Noratrieb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very cool. I didn't spot any issues except two nits, although I may want to take a second look when you've fixed those.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

(
impl Tag for $Self:ty;
$(
$($path:ident)::* $( { $( $fields:tt )* })? <=> $tag:literal,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is customization according to $tag useful?
If not, you can use ${index()} to generate it automatically, like rustc_metadata::rmeta::table does.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the answer is "it could, but probably isn't". I'll work on it next week.

@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 21, 2023
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 24, 2023
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

Great!
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 25, 2023

📌 Commit bec7ce4 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 25, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#110556 (Switch to `EarlyBinder` for `explicit_item_bounds`)
 - rust-lang#110615 (Add `impl_tag!` macro to implement `Tag` for tagged pointer easily)
 - rust-lang#110649 (Fix no_global_oom_handling build)
 - rust-lang#110671 (Consider polarity in new solver)
 - rust-lang#110783 (Fix ICE on --print=... i/o errors)
 - rust-lang#110796 (Updating Wake example to use new 'pin!' macro)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 8d00a8d into rust-lang:master Apr 25, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone Apr 25, 2023
@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin deleted the impl_tag branch May 7, 2023 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants