Skip to content

Conversation

TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki commented Aug 1, 2022

The suggestion implemented in #75608 was not working properly, so I fixed it.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Aug 1, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @oli-obk

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 1, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki changed the title Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait [WIP] Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait Aug 1, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2022 09:48
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki changed the title [WIP] Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait Aug 1, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2022 11:26
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #100024) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki force-pushed the suggest-boxed-trait-objects-instead-of-impl-trait branch from 719a1a1 to d90a715 Compare August 2, 2022 02:54
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 7, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #100213) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki force-pushed the suggest-boxed-trait-objects-instead-of-impl-trait branch from d90a715 to 82f2c08 Compare August 7, 2022 07:50
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Aug 7, 2022

r? @rust-lang/wg-diagnostics

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@TaKO8Ki it has only been 6 days since you've submitted this PR, so please wait a bit longer before requesting a new reviewer 😅

@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Aug 7, 2022

@compiler-errors I had a conflict and requested a review, but as you said, I'll wait a little longer.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? is to get a new reviewer, not to signal that the PR is ready for a review. But since I already am notified for this, I can take a look later today after a flight.

r? @compiler-errors

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Looks good!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 7, 2022

📌 Commit 82f2c08 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 7, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#100019 (Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait)
 - rust-lang#100038 (Document the `no-std` target option in config.toml.example)
 - rust-lang#100194 (Remove even more box syntax uses from src/test)
 - rust-lang#100206 (test: skip terminfo parsing in Miri)
 - rust-lang#100230 (Use start_point instead of next_point to point to elided lifetime amp…)
 - rust-lang#100244 (Add armv4t-none-eabi take2)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7be359e into rust-lang:master Aug 8, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Aug 8, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki deleted the suggest-boxed-trait-objects-instead-of-impl-trait branch August 8, 2022 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants