Skip to content

fix comments in test for split_once #8669

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2022

Conversation

kyoto7250
Copy link
Contributor

@kyoto7250 kyoto7250 commented Apr 9, 2022

This PR fixed comments in test.

split_once was stabilized in 1.52, so I think the comments maybe be wrong.

ref:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/string/struct.String.html#method.split_once

thank you in advance.

changelog: none

split_once was stabilized in 1.52
@rust-highfive
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @camsteffen (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Apr 9, 2022
@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

xFrednet commented Apr 9, 2022

Looks good to me, thank you for the update 🙃

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 9, 2022

📌 Commit a951148 has been approved by xFrednet

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 9, 2022

⌛ Testing commit a951148 with merge cfd52aa...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 9, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: xFrednet
Pushing cfd52aa to master...

@bors bors merged commit cfd52aa into rust-lang:master Apr 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants