Description
(rdoc --version: 6.4.0)
RDoc (and by extension, YARD out-of-the-box) has Markdown support, but it doesn’t work correctly when it comes to nested emphasis/strong text, in-line code and links.
Refer to the sample I’ve provided. I’ve included both popular style (backtick for code, square-round brackets for link) and RDoc style (plus for code, curly-square for link).
Input
*`1_tick`*
*+1_plus+*
`*tick_1*`
+*plus_1*+
**`2_tick`**
**+2_plus+**
`**tick_2**`
+**plus_2**+
[*square_1*](https://example.org)
{*curly_1*}[https://example.org]
*[1_square](https://example.org)*
*{1_curly}[https://example.org]*
[**square_2**](https://example.org)
{**curly_2**}[https://example.org]
**[2_square](https://example.org)**
**{2_curly}[https://example.org]**
[`square_tick`](https://example.org)
{`curly_tick`}[https://example.org]
`[tick_square](https://example.org)`
`{tick_curly}[https://example.org]`
[+square_plus+](https://example.org)
{+curly_plus+}[https://example.org]
+[plus_square](https://example.org)+
+{plus_curly}[https://example.org]+Expected (formatted in GitHub Markdown)
1_tick
1_plus
*tick_1*
*plus_1*
2_tick
2_plus
**tick_2**
**plus_2**
[tick_square](https://example.org)
{tick_curly}[https://example.org]
[plus_square](https://example.org)
{plus_curly}[https://example.org]
Actual (copy-pasted verbatim from output HTML’s source)
1_tick
1_plus
tick_1
+plus_1+
2_tick
2_plus
tick_2
+plus_2+
{square_1}
{curly_1}
{1_square}[https://example.org]
{1_curly}[https://example.org]
{square_2}
{curly_2}
{2_square}[https://example.org]
{2_curly}[https://example.org]
{square_tick}
{curly_tick}
[tick_square](https://example.org)
{tick_curly}[https://example.org]
{square_plus}
{curly_plus}