Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Conversation

pmacik
Copy link
Contributor

@pmacik pmacik commented Jun 20, 2022

Signed-off-by: Pavel Macík [email protected]

Related to: #1172

Changes

Currently, if error occurs which is related to getting Subject Access Review for a ClusterWorkloadResourceMapping resources. The error is not shown to explain the reason and only the false value is returned.

This PR adds an error log for such events to see the root cause of the error.

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Docs
    included if any changes are user facing
  • Tests
    included if any functionality added or changed. For bugfixes please include tests that can catch regressions
  • All acceptance test scenarios included in the PR which verifies a bugfix or a requested feature reported by a non-member are tagged with @external-feedback tag.
  • Follows the commit message standard

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from baijum and dperaza4dustbit June 20, 2022 05:59
@pmacik pmacik added the kind/enhancement New feature or request label Jun 20, 2022
@pmacik pmacik added this to the 1.1.1 milestone Jun 20, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1174 (1afde2c) into master (771154a) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1174      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.71%   58.69%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines        2781     2782       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         1633     1633              
- Misses        987      988       +1     
  Partials      161      161              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/reconcile/pipeline/context/impl.go 66.24% <0.00%> (-0.17%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 771154a...1afde2c. Read the comment docs.

@Kartikey-star
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@Kartikey-star
Copy link
Contributor

Kartikey-star commented Jun 20, 2022

/approved

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 20, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@pmacik pmacik merged commit 7f09a38 into redhat-developer:master Jun 20, 2022
@pmacik pmacik deleted the fix/subject-access-review-err branch August 12, 2022 15:02
pmacik added a commit to pmacik/service-binding-operator that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants