Skip to content

Upstreaming linters from Google's internal linting suite #884

@MichaelChirico

Description

@MichaelChirico

Internally at Google we use lintr to power our in-editor and CI-based R linting tools. Over the last year+ (in addition to working directly on lintr) we have been building out a set of linters that extends the suite offered by lintr. Currently, the package has >60 such linters, almost all of which we think are widely relevant. They have all been test on & applied to existing internal R code at Google.

We are happy to contribute any subset of these to lintr. Here is a brief summary of all of them; I can elaborate more as needed:

What do you think is the best way to decide about which are in/out of scope for lintr? Does it make sense to delay this until 3.0 is released, or push to include with the major version bump?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions