Update rustls to 0.23 and ring to 0.17

[djc]

No description provided.

[getong]

I think you might also change the code in directory quinn/examples, like server.rs and client.rs.

rustls::Certificate has been replaced with CertificateDer from the new rustls-pki-types crate.
Likewise, rustls::PrivateKey has been replaced with rustls_pki_types::PrivateKeyDer.

The code in examples does not compile.

[djc]

@getong there is a reason the PR is in draft state.

[PikuZheng]

In order to make ring support some architectures, I hope to upgrade ring to 0.17 as soon as possible

[PikuZheng]

In order to make ring support some architectures, I hope to upgrade ring to 0.17 as soon as possible

@PikuZheng I believe ring 0.17 is already available with Quinn. The existing Quinn 0.10 release uses Rustls 0.21, which has upgraded to ring 0.17 as of v0.21.8. You don't need to wait for Quinn to have Rustls 0.22 support for this.

├── quinn v0.10.2
│   ├── bytes v1.5.0
│   ├── pin-project-lite v0.2.13
│   ├── quinn-proto v0.10.6
│   │   ├── bytes v1.5.0
│   │   ├── rand v0.8.5
│   │   │   ├── libc v0.2.151
│   │   │   ├── rand_chacha v0.3.1
│   │   │   │   ├── ppv-lite86 v0.2.17
│   │   │   │   └── rand_core v0.6.4
│   │   │   │       └── getrandom v0.2.11 (*)
│   │   │   └── rand_core v0.6.4 (*)
│   │   ├── ring v0.16.20
│   │   │   ├── libc v0.2.151
│   │   │   ├── once_cell v1.19.0
│   │   │   ├── spin v0.5.2
│   │   │   └── untrusted v0.7.1
│   │   ├── rustc-hash v1.1.0
│   │   ├── rustls v0.21.10 (*)
│   │   ├── slab v0.4.9 (*)
│   │   ├── thiserror v1.0.52 (*)
│   │   ├── tinyvec v1.6.0
│   │   │   └── tinyvec_macros v0.1.1
│   │   └── tracing v0.1.40 (*)

anything i'm missing?

[cpu]

anything i'm missing?

No, this was my mistake. I forgot Quinn also has ring in its public API and didn't take the breaking change to update to 0.17 in the 0.10 release like Rustls did.

Sorry for the confusion. There is a change required in this repo to remove ring 0.16 from the requirements.

[Ralith]

Made a deep pass; looks like only some minor cosmetic issues left.

[djc]

@Ralith I think this is ready for another round -- hoping it will be the last one!

[djc]

Release progress is tracked in #1737.