-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
Closed
Labels
area/reactive-messagingarea/smallryeenv/windowsImpacts Windows machinesImpacts Windows machineskind/bugSomething isn't workingSomething isn't working
Description
Describe the bug
I'm using same Rabbit MQ queue and publish messages to the exchange for this queue with different routing-keys (and different structure).
Expected behavior
I expect that methods annotated with @Incoming
should handle messages only with routing-keys specified in mp.messaging.incoming.<channel-name>.routing-keys
Actual behavior
@Incoming
doesn't consider configured routing-keys, and messages are handled by both handlers distributing by round-robin principle.
How to Reproduce?
mp:
messaging:
incoming:
foo:
connector: smallrye-rabbitmq
exchange:
name: example.exchange
queue:
name: example.queue
routing-keys: example.queue.foo
bar:
connector: smallrye-rabbitmq
exchange:
name: example.exchange
queue:
name: example.queue
routing-keys: example.queue.bar
@Blocking
@Incoming("foo")
void onFoo(Message<Foo> message) {
//do something
}
@Blocking
@Incoming("bar")
void onBar(Message<Bar> message) {
//do something
}
Output of uname -a
or ver
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.26100.4061]
Output of java -version
Corretto 21.0.6
Quarkus version or git rev
3.22.1
Build tool (ie. output of mvnw --version
or gradlew --version
)
gradle 8.12
Additional information
Is there some sort of misconfiguration? Or should I have only 1 handler (@Incoming
) and handle messages with different methods based on routing-key in metadata manually?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
area/reactive-messagingarea/smallryeenv/windowsImpacts Windows machinesImpacts Windows machineskind/bugSomething isn't workingSomething isn't working