Fix incorrect recipe for SSDlite320 #6536
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hey @datumbox! You merged this PR, but no labels were added. The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py |
facebook-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2022
Reviewed By: YosuaMichael Differential Revision: D39381966 fbshipit-source-id: 2325ff48ae1a4ad09302663119c4726d343094b3
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The information on
ssdlite320_mobilenet_v3_largerecipe is wrong. I checked my notes and the network was trained without pre-training from ImageNet. The issue was detected while trying to reproduce the results at #6433 (comment)