Skip to content

bpo-30298: Weaken the condition of deprecation warnings for inline modifiers. #1490

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 10, 2017

Conversation

serhiy-storchaka
Copy link
Member

Now allowed several subsequential inline modifiers at the start of the
pattern (e.g. '(?i)(?s)...'). In verbose mode whitespaces and comments
now are allowed before and between inline modifiers (e.g.
'(?x) (?i) (?s)...').

…difiers.

Now allowed several subsequential inline modifiers at the start of the
pattern (e.g. '(?i)(?s)...').  In verbose mode whitespaces and comments
now are allowed before and between inline modifiers (e.g.
'(?x) (?i) (?s)...').
@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka merged commit 305ccbe into python:master May 10, 2017
@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka deleted the re-inline-modifiers branch May 10, 2017 03:05
serhiy-storchaka added a commit to serhiy-storchaka/cpython that referenced this pull request May 10, 2017
…ine modifiers. (pythonGH-1490)

Now allowed several subsequential inline modifiers at the start of the
pattern (e.g. '(?i)(?s)...').  In verbose mode whitespaces and comments
now are allowed before and between inline modifiers (e.g.
'(?x) (?i) (?s)...')..
(cherry picked from commit 305ccbe)
serhiy-storchaka added a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2017
…ine modifiers. (GH-1490) (#1525)

Now allowed several subsequential inline modifiers at the start of the
pattern (e.g. '(?i)(?s)...').  In verbose mode whitespaces and comments
now are allowed before and between inline modifiers (e.g.
'(?x) (?i) (?s)...')..
(cherry picked from commit 305ccbe)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants