Added PyEncoder and support BLP saving #6069
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hugovk
reviewed
Feb 19, 2022
radarhere
force-pushed
the
pyencoder
branch
2 times, most recently
from
749926c to
d61470b
Compare
Closed
radarhere
added a commit
to radarhere/Pillow
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2022
radarhere
added a commit
to radarhere/Pillow
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #4059
Resolves #3176
#1938 added
Image.register_encoder(), but stopped short of creatingImageFile.PyEncoderto go with it.First, however, some cleanup - tests from #4885 and #3190 were blindly appended to the end of Tests/test_imagefile.py. This incorrectly made them a part of the unrelated
TestPyDecoderclass. So I have moved them up to theTestImageFileclass.I've implemented a PyEncoder for BLP.