[RTM] multi-start values testing

[EveCharbie]

All Submissions:

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document [docs/contribution.md]?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open [Pull Requests] for the same update/change?
• Have you opened/linked the issue related to your pull request?
• Have you used the tag [WIP] for on-going changes, and removed it when the pull request was ready?
• When ready to merge, have you sent a comment pinging @pariterre in it?

New Feature Submissions:

1. Does your submission pass the tests (if not please explain why this is intended)?
2. Did you write a proper documentation (docstrings and ReadMe)
3. Have you linted your code locally prior to submission (using the command: black . -l120 --exclude "external/*")?

Changes to Core Features:

• Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
• Have you written new examples for your core changes, as applicable?
• Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?

---

This change is 

[pariterre]

Reviewed 5 of 7 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2, 3 of 3 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @EveCharbie)

---

bioptim/examples/getting_started/custom_initial_guess.py line 20 at r3 (raw file):

import numpy as np
import biorbd_casadi as biorbd
from bioptim.misc.enums import MagnitudeType

This seems related to @rapidnico PR. But it should not appear here. I actually specifically asked in the other PR to change this... If your PR are related, merge your work in a single PR, otherwise I am bound to repeat myself not knowing who is responsible for the changes

---

bioptim/limits/path_conditions.py line 1150 at r3 (raw file):

            raise ValueError("bounds must be specified to generate noised initial guess")

        if len(bounds) != nb_phases:

I assume all these changes are not yours?

Code quote:

    @staticmethod
    def _check_type_and_format_bounds(bounds, nb_phases):
        """
        Check bounds type and format

        Parameters
        ----------
        nb_phases
            The number of phases
        """
        if bounds is None:
            raise ValueError("bounds must be specified to generate noised initial guess")

        if len(bounds) != nb_phases:
            raise ValueError(f"Invalid size of 'bounds', 'bounds' must be size {nb_phases}")

        return bounds

---

tests/test_update_bounds_and_init.py line 5 at r3 (raw file):

import biorbd_casadi as biorbd
from casadi import MX
from bioptim.misc.enums import MagnitudeType

This should not appear as is, as specified in the @rapidnico PR

[EveCharbie]

This PR was not RTR. Yes I merged Rapidnico's branch into mine in the mean time. But I will surely wait until his PR is accepted before asking you to review ;)

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @EveCharbie)

[pariterre]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r4, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @EveCharbie)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 80.53% // Head: 80.53% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (ed66775) compared to base (8fbd14e).
Patch coverage: 0.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #570   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.53%   80.53%           
=======================================
  Files          95       95           
  Lines       10498    10498           
=======================================
  Hits         8455     8455           
  Misses       2043     2043           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...tim/examples/getting_started/example_multistart.py	26.47% <0.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[pariterre]

Reviewed 9 of 9 files at r5, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @EveCharbie)

[pariterre]

@EveCharbie RTM?

[EveCharbie]

@pariterre yep :)