Distribution: Add tools section (ASTE, config-visualizer, ci-images)#230
Merged
Distribution: Add tools section (ASTE, config-visualizer, ci-images)#230
Conversation
Member
|
Do we really want to include the ci images? They aren't useful to the normal user. aste and config visualizer look fine. |
Member
Author
They are in the pad as a new component, without any comments regarding not including them. Whatever you prefer. I would say they are helpful to users and developer-users relying on Docker. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, we did not mention any tools in the distribution page, so I overlooked that we wanted to include ASTE, the config-visualizer, and the ci-images this time.
This adds a "tools" section underneath preCICE, with these three components.
@fsimonis please confirm the versions. There is nothing else we wanted to include this time, right?
@uekerman FYI