Expose radvd option nat64prefix (PREF64) in GUI #8289
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Ideally we want to do this but we need to move the RA page to MVC/API first, which is going to be on the roadmao for 25.7 most likely. |
AdSchellevis
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
bfdf0d3 to
968e5f9
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Expose the
nat64prefixoption in Router Advertisements in the GUI. This is an alternative to the existing DNS64 support in Unbound, which breaks DNSSEC. Support for this option appeared in radvd 2.20, which was added in OPNSense 25.1.The option is added in the Router Advertisements advanced options section. I kept the lowercase naming to match the option in the config, but it does look a bit out of place in the GUI this way.
I did not add the
AdvValidLifeTimeoption within as it conflicts with an existing advanced option with the same name. I also did not add any input validation, but can add some if this is requested.Fixes #7487