Skip to content

[enterprise-4.18] OBSDOCS-2209: Place a redirect notice on OCP logging docs #96624

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2025

Conversation

theashiot
Copy link
Contributor

@theashiot theashiot commented Jul 24, 2025

Version(s): 4.18

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2209

Link to docs preview:

QE review: Not required as there are no technical changes.

Additional information:
Original PR to main: #94807

All the following PRs are for making the change in the original PR to older releases. I had to make separate PRs because the structure of the logging docs is different in each older release and therefore automatic cherry-picks would have failed. Please consider reviewing the following PRs as well:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 24, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2209 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.18, 4.17

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2209

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 24, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jul 24, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@JoaoBraveCoding JoaoBraveCoding left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 25, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 28, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 28, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 28, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2209 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.18, 4.17

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2209

Link to docs preview:

QE review: Not required as there are no technical changes.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 28, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2209 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.18

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2209

Link to docs preview:

QE review: Not required as there are no technical changes.

Additional information:
Original PR to main: #94807

All the following PRs are for making the change in the original PR to older releases. I had to make separate PRs because the structure of the logging docs is different in each older release and therefore automatic cherry-picks would have failed. Please consider reviewing the following PRs as well:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@max-cx max-cx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🙂 I'm glad you're completing your standalone transition, Ashwin.

I added several peer-review comments from the point of view of a soon-standalone writer.

This completes my peer review.

If you need a merge review, let me know in the Slack thread.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 1, 2025

@theashiot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@max-cx max-cx added the peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR label Aug 4, 2025
@max-cx max-cx merged commit 4089039 into openshift:enterprise-4.18 Aug 4, 2025
2 checks passed
@max-cx max-cx changed the title OBSDOCS-2209: Place a redirect notice on OCP logging docs [enterprise-4.18] OBSDOCS-2209: Place a redirect notice on OCP logging docs Aug 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants