Skip to content

Add release note for physicalNetworkName for OVN-Kubernetes secondary networks #89471

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: enterprise-4.18
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add release note for physicalNetworkName for OVN-Kubernetes secondary networks #89471

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jab-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@jab-rh jab-rh commented Mar 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@jab-rh jab-rh added this to the Continuous Release milestone Mar 3, 2025
@jab-rh jab-rh self-assigned this Mar 3, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 3, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Mar 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Wed Apr 16 01:10:30 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://89471--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-18-release-notes.html

@jab-rh jab-rh changed the title Add physicalNetworkName for OVN-Kubernetes secondary networks Add release note for physicalNetworkName for OVN-Kubernetes secondary networks Mar 27, 2025
@jab-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

jab-rh commented Apr 3, 2025

Refs #87994 (comment)

@jab-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

jab-rh commented Apr 3, 2025

@weliang1, do we know when this might get tested by QE? Thanks!

@weliang1
Copy link

weliang1 commented Apr 3, 2025

@weliang1, do we know when this might get tested by QE? Thanks!

@jab-rh Yes, it has been tested by our QE.
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 3, 2025
@jab-rh jab-rh closed this Apr 9, 2025
@jab-rh jab-rh reopened this Apr 9, 2025
@jab-rh jab-rh added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 9, 2025
@eromanova97
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label peer-review-needed

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 9, 2025
eromanova97
eromanova97 reviewed Apr 9, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@eromanova97 eromanova97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noting this just in case, this PR will require change management: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fLMpK4bqthtFlCwA36yeo2cI-pExFpX76VMnSi_In6Q/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.nckpao8upx1u

@eromanova97
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Apr 9, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 16, 2025
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 16, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 16, 2025

@jab-rh: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jab-rh jab-rh mentioned this pull request May 2, 2025
Merged
1 task
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 5, 2025
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Sep 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@eromanova97 eromanova97 eromanova97 left review comments

Assignees

@weliang1 weliang1

@jab-rh jab-rh

Labels
branch/enterprise-4.18 lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Continuous Release
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@jab-rh @ocpdocs-previewbot @weliang1 @eromanova97 @openshift-bot