Skip to content

add feature flag and parallelism config to PRWE #207

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 13, 2025

Conversation

obs-gh-alexlew
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

OB-XXX Please explain the changes you made here.

Checklist

  • Created tests which fail without the change (if possible)
  • Extended the README / documentation, if necessary

Copy link

@orca-security-us orca-security-us bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Orca Security Scan Summary

Status Check Issues by priority
Passed Passed Infrastructure as Code high 0   medium 0   low 0   info 0 View in Orca
Passed Passed SAST high 0   medium 0   low 0   info 0 View in Orca
Passed Passed Secrets high 0   medium 0   low 0   info 0 View in Orca
Passed Passed Vulnerabilities high 0   medium 0   low 0   info 0 View in Orca

@@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ collector on the current host.`
for _, path := range originalConfigs {
configFlag.Value.Set(path)
}
// Set PRWE enable multiple workers feature gate.
EnableMultipleWritersFlag := otleCmd.Flags().Lookup("feature-gates")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason to start the name with an upper case E? I think lower case would be more conventional.

Comment on lines 100 to 102
remote_write_queue:
num_consumers: 10
max_batch_request_parallelism: 10
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is set to 10 but the helm chart uses 5 for both of these values. I think it's better to be consistent unless I'm missing something

@obs-gh-alexlew obs-gh-alexlew merged commit c9c4636 into main May 13, 2025
12 checks passed
@obs-gh-alexlew obs-gh-alexlew deleted the alew/add-parallelism-to-prom-exporter branch May 13, 2025 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants