Skip to content

chore(description): fit to landing page #7864

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2025

Conversation

AugustinMauroy
Copy link
Member

@AugustinMauroy AugustinMauroy commented Jun 13, 2025

Description

Just realized that description didn't reflect the current tag line.

new head :

<title>Node.js — Run JavaScript Everywhere</title>
<meta name="description" content="Node.js® is a free, open-source, cross-platform JavaScript runtime environment that lets developers create servers, web apps, command line tools and scripts."/>

Related Issues

No related issues

Check List

  • I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
  • I have run pnpm format to ensure the code follows the style guide.
  • I have run pnpm test to check if all tests are passing.
  • I have run pnpm build to check if the website builds without errors.
  • I've covered new added functionality with unit tests if necessary.

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 13, 2025 09:43
@AugustinMauroy AugustinMauroy requested a review from a team as a code owner June 13, 2025 09:43
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 13, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 13, 2025 9:43am

Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the site description to align with the current tagline for the landing page.

  • Updated the description text in apps/site/site.json to provide a more detailed description of Node.js.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.48%. Comparing base (41ed5ee) to head (9c759e3).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7864      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.43%   75.48%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         101      101              
  Lines        8306     8306              
  Branches      218      218              
==========================================
+ Hits         6266     6270       +4     
+ Misses       2038     2034       -4     
  Partials        2        2              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@bjohansebas bjohansebas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ovflowd ovflowd added the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Jun 17, 2025
@ovflowd ovflowd enabled auto-merge June 17, 2025 23:32
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Jun 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 17, 2025

Lighthouse Results

URL Performance Accessibility Best Practices SEO Report
/en 🟢 99 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/about 🟢 100 🟢 96 🟢 100 🟠 82 🔗
/en/about/previous-releases 🟢 99 🟢 96 🟢 100 🟠 83 🔗
/en/download 🟢 94 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/blog 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 96 🟢 92 🔗

@ovflowd ovflowd added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 19284ef Jun 17, 2025
15 checks passed
@ovflowd ovflowd deleted the chore(description)-fit-to-landing branch June 17, 2025 23:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants