Skip to content

Conversation

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/startup

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem. v22.x Issues that can be reproduced on v22.x or PRs targeting the v22.x-staging branch. labels Jan 12, 2025
@aduh95 aduh95 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 3, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 3, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

jasnell and others added 3 commits February 4, 2025 10:14
The `process.ref(...)` and `process.unref(...)` methods are intended
to replace the use of `ref()` and `unref()` methods defined directly
on individual API objects. The existing `ref()` and `unref()` methods
will be marked as legacy and won't be removed but new APIs should use
`process.ref()` and `process.unref()` instead.

Refs: nodejs#53266
PR-URL: nodejs#56400
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#56571
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#56517
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#56571
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#56552
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#56571
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
@aduh95 aduh95 force-pushed the backport-unref-ref branch from 390e8fa to 6ad8990 Compare February 4, 2025 09:15
@aduh95 aduh95 merged commit 6ad8990 into nodejs:v22.x-staging Feb 4, 2025
19 of 21 checks passed
@aduh95 aduh95 deleted the backport-unref-ref branch February 4, 2025 09:16
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2025
The `process.ref(...)` and `process.unref(...)` methods are intended
to replace the use of `ref()` and `unref()` methods defined directly
on individual API objects. The existing `ref()` and `unref()` methods
will be marked as legacy and won't be removed but new APIs should use
`process.ref()` and `process.unref()` instead.

Refs: #53266
PR-URL: #56400
Backport-PR-URL: #56571
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]>
aduh95 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2025
PR-URL: #56517
Backport-PR-URL: #56571
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
aduh95 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2025
PR-URL: #56552
Backport-PR-URL: #56571
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem. v22.x Issues that can be reproduced on v22.x or PRs targeting the v22.x-staging branch.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants