fix: compatible with pool stats reading #578
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @fengmk2, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on a small but important documentation improvement. It addresses a typo within the README.md file, ensuring the project's primary documentation is accurate and professional for new and existing users.
Highlights
- Documentation Fix: Corrected a minor typo (
exmapletoexample) in theREADME.mdfile to improve readability and accuracy.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@fengmk2 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 39 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
WalkthroughThe Node.js versions tested in CI were updated from 23 to 24. The test coverage script was modified to use a new patch file for Node.js 16 compatibility, replacing the previous structuredClone patch. A new patch file was added to polyfill both Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
commit: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/nodejs.yml(1 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)test/patch-for-node16.cjs(1 hunks)test/patch-structuredClone.cjs(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- test/patch-structuredClone.cjs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/nodejs.yml
- test/patch-for-node16.cjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 16)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 16)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)
81-81: Check plugin/core version alignment for Vitest 3.2.4
@vitest/coverage-v8is still pinned at^3.0.2. Mismatched sub-majors occasionally ship breaking internal API changes.
Please verify that3.0.2(or whatever^3.0.xresolves to) is compatible with Vitest3.2.x; otherwise bump the plugin to^3.2.4as well.
package.json
Outdated
| @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ | |||
| "test": "npm run lint -- --fix && vitest run", | |||
| "test-keepalive": "cross-env TEST_KEEPALIVE_COUNT=50 vitest run --test-timeout 180000 keep-alive-header.test.ts", | |||
| "test-node16": "node examples/httpclient.cjs && node examples/search_github.cjs && node examples/timing.cjs", | |||
| "cov": "cross-env NODE_OPTIONS='--require ./test/patch-structuredClone.cjs' vitest run --coverage", | |||
| "cov": "cross-env NODE_OPTIONS='--require ./test/patch-for-node16.cjs' vitest run --coverage", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
❓ Verification inconclusive
Quote usage in NODE_OPTIONS breaks on Windows cmd / PowerShell
cross-env does not strip the single quotes on Windows, so NODE_OPTIONS will literally be set to
'--require ./test/patch-for-node16.cjs', causing Node to treat the leading ' as part of the flag and fail to load the patch.
Replace the quoted string with an un-quoted assignment (POSIX shells still parse it correctly).
-"cov": "cross-env NODE_OPTIONS='--require ./test/patch-for-node16.cjs' vitest run --coverage",
+"cov": "cross-env NODE_OPTIONS=--require ./test/patch-for-node16.cjs vitest run --coverage",Update cov script to remove single quotes for Windows compatibility
Remove the single quotes around the --require flag so that cross-env sets NODE_OPTIONS correctly on Windows shells.
- File:
package.json, line 42
- "cov": "cross-env NODE_OPTIONS='--require ./test/patch-for-node16.cjs' vitest run --coverage",
+ "cov": "cross-env NODE_OPTIONS=--require ./test/patch-for-node16.cjs vitest run --coverage",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "cov": "cross-env NODE_OPTIONS='--require ./test/patch-for-node16.cjs' vitest run --coverage", | |
| "cov": "cross-env NODE_OPTIONS=--require ./test/patch-for-node16.cjs vitest run --coverage", |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json at line 42, the cov script uses single quotes around the
--require flag which causes issues on Windows shells. Remove the single quotes
around --require ./test/patch-for-node16.cjs so that cross-env sets NODE_OPTIONS
correctly on Windows. This will ensure the script runs properly across different
environments.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #578 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.89% 95.89%
=======================================
Files 11 11
Lines 1339 1339
Branches 309 309
=======================================
Hits 1284 1284
Misses 51 51
Partials 4 4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
[skip ci] ## [4.6.12](v4.6.11...v4.6.12) (2025-06-28) ### Bug Fixes * compatible with pool stats reading ([#578](#578)) ([13a29af](13a29af))
Summary by CodeRabbit